Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41601345›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Active sensing: different plume structures affect movements of antennae in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Christopher M Jernigan, Erin Connor, Hong Lei, Jonathan D Victor, John Crimaldi, Brian H Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Fly navigational responses exploit plume-specific odor motion and gradient cues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher M JerniganSchool of Life Sciences , Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Erin ConnorCivil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Hong LeiSchool of Life Sciences , Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5619-3097
Jonathan D VictorFeil Family Brain and Mind Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
John CrimaldiCivil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Brian H SmithSchool of Life Sciences , Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7018-8561

Funding

CRCNS: Switching antennal lobe dynamic regime via olfactory and mechanical signalR01DC020892 · NIDCD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BAZHENOV, MAKSIM V, LEI, HONG · 2022 to 2024
$1.1M
CIHRDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschafFonds de recherche du QuébecNational Science FoundationNational Science Foundation 2014217NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020892UK Research and Innovation-Medical Research Council 2014217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects move their antennae to actively sense their environment. Regarding olfaction, it is not clear how these movements might be optimized for sampling the odor environment. Honey bees have movable rod-like antennae, the last of segment of which is covered in several thousand pore plate sensillae that contain dendrites of olfactory sensory neurons. Walking honey bees typically move their antennae in an almost constant manner. These movements can be impacted by odor valence, either innate or learned, suggesting that these movements are under sensory control. However, it is unclear whether these movements are under active control or are simply fixed responses to stimulation. Here, we evaluated antennal movements of stationary bees when placed in odor plumes with different structures. Antennae took up on average two different positions in the plume, in both the absence and presence of odor. One corresponded to upwind and toward the odor source. The other position was across the plume. Bees rapidly switched between these positions regardless of the presence of odor. The frequency of forward and lateral positioning depended on the presence/absence of odor and on the structure of the plume, which suggests that movement is involved in sensing odor filaments. We conclude that these movements represent active sensing, analogous to sniffing in mammals. Future investigations need to focus on the connection between antennal movements and physiological sensing as well as on analyses of odor-driven antennal movements in freely moving bees. Our results also suggest that active sensing may differ across insects with different antennal morphologies.

Indexed as

Active sensingAntennae movementApis melliferaHoney beeOlfaction

Identifiers

PMID41601345
PMCPMC12997459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.