ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Active sensing: different plume structures affect movements of antennae in honey bees (Apis mellifera).
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fly navigational responses exploit plume-specific odor motion and gradient cues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insects move their antennae to actively sense their environment. Regarding olfaction, it is not clear how these movements might be optimized for sampling the odor environment. Honey bees have movable rod-like antennae, the last of segment of which is covered in several thousand pore plate sensillae that contain dendrites of olfactory sensory neurons. Walking honey bees typically move their antennae in an almost constant manner. These movements can be impacted by odor valence, either innate or learned, suggesting that these movements are under sensory control. However, it is unclear whether these movements are under active control or are simply fixed responses to stimulation. Here, we evaluated antennal movements of stationary bees when placed in odor plumes with different structures. Antennae took up on average two different positions in the plume, in both the absence and presence of odor. One corresponded to upwind and toward the odor source. The other position was across the plume. Bees rapidly switched between these positions regardless of the presence of odor. The frequency of forward and lateral positioning depended on the presence/absence of odor and on the structure of the plume, which suggests that movement is involved in sensing odor filaments. We conclude that these movements represent active sensing, analogous to sniffing in mammals. Future investigations need to focus on the connection between antennal movements and physiological sensing as well as on analyses of odor-driven antennal movements in freely moving bees. Our results also suggest that active sensing may differ across insects with different antennal morphologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.