Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41601318›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2026

Phylosymbiosis and functional redundancy in the Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) gut microbiome and its implications for host fitness.

Jahir Muñoz-Hernández, Ignacio Peralta-Maraver, Grisel Cavieres, Ignacio Gutiérrez-Cortés, Enrico L Rezende, Daniela S Rivera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jahir Muñoz-HernándezGEMA Center for Genomics, Ecology and Environment, Facultad de Ciencias, Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0009-0004-6501-1381
Ignacio Peralta-MaraverDepartamento de Ecología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3467-7664
Grisel CavieresDepartamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-2923
Ignacio Gutiérrez-CortésExtreme Ecosystem Microbiomics & Ecogenomics Lab, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0009-0006-3867-8759
Enrico L RezendeCenter of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES), Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-6245-9605
Daniela S RiveraGEMA Center for Genomics, Ecology and Environment, Facultad de Ciencias, Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-423X

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 11190637Universidad Mayor Doctoral Fellowship and the ANID National Doctoral Fellowship 21241747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome plays a fundamental role in host ecophysiology. Numerous studies have examined microbiome composition and functionality to understand the ecological and evolutionary factors shaping host-microbe interactions. However, the consequences of these patterns for animal ecology remain poorly understood. Here, we examined how variations in the gut microbiome influence fitness differences among Drosophila species sharing a common dietary niche. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we analyzed the gut microbial taxonomy and predicted functional profiles of 4 Drosophila species collected in central Chile. Our results revealed a strong signal of phylosymbiosis in the microbial taxonomy, while functionality was highly redundant across the studied fly species. Functional biomarkers analysis indicated that the gut microbiome supports the nutritional requirements of D. simulans (Sturtevant), D. hydei (Sturtevant), and D. repleta (Wollaston); whereas, this was less evident in D. melanogaster (Meigen). To assess the potential contribution of the microbiome to host performance, we compared egg-to-adult viability between 2 species with the greatest physiological divergence: D. simulans and D. hydei. Notably, D. simulans exhibited significantly higher egg viability and shorter development time than D. hydei. Strikingly, the D. simulans microbiome contained more taxonomic and functional biomarkers previously demonstrated to enhance fly fitness, whereas the D. hydei microbiome harbored taxa and functions potentially detrimental to host performance. These findings suggest that the gut microbiome contributes to host fitness and may shape the evolutionary ecology of Drosophila species, with broader implications for community dynamics, including interspecific competition and species displacement.

Indexed as

DrosophilaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenetic FitnessSymbiosisAnimalsChileFemaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sgut microorganismholobionthost reproductionmicrobial functionsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID41601318
PMCPMC12848231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.