ArticleViruses2026
Feature-Based Growth Curve Classification Enables Efficient Phage Discrimination.
Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid isolation of therapeutic bacteriophages from environmental sources is essential for personalized phage therapy, particularly when appropriate phages are unavailable in existing banks. However, comprehensive characterization of all candidate phages is resource-intensive, especially when plaque morphologies are similar and fail to discriminate between distinct phages. Here, we present an upstream screening approach that utilizes co-culture growth curve analysis to rapidly triage phage isolates during the early isolation process. We extracted seven biologically meaningful features that capture lysis kinetics, lysis efficiency, and post-lysis dynamics from bacterial growth curves and applied unsupervised clustering algorithms for phage discrimination. Validation using T-phages at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01 demonstrated superior clustering performance (Adjusted Rand Index = 0.881 ± 0.057) compared to established metrics including the Virulence Index and Centroid Index. Application to phages isolated from sewage successfully identified all three genomically distinct species present (sampling score = 1.0), enabling targeted selection of representative phages for downstream characterization. This approach reduced candidates requiring detailed analysis by two-thirds (from 21 to 7 isolates) while maintaining complete species coverage, thereby providing an efficient and scalable screening tool that reduces workload for downstream analyses and accelerates discovery of novel therapeutic phages for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.