Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600837›Full record

ReviewViruses2026

Enterovirus D68 Sequence Variations and Pathogenicity: A Review.

Yi Zhu, Liting Wang, Jun Shen

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi ZhuInfectious Disease Department, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai 201102, China.
Liting WangInfectious Disease Department, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai 201102, China.
Jun ShenInfectious Disease Department, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai 201102, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8759-6921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), a neurotropic respiratory pathogen, poses a considerable clinical threat through its link to pediatric acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) and severe respiratory illness. The possibility of recurrent epidemics, evidenced since the 2014 outbreak, remains a major concern. Genomic determinants of virulence are central to this threat. Sequence variations that affect host-receptor interactions, immune evasion, and replication efficiency serve as critical modifiers of pathogenicity. This article systematically reviews the evidence for specific genomic sites that enhance EV-D68 virulence, focusing on three critical regions: the VP1 receptor-binding site, the 2Apro/TRAF3 cleavage site, and the 3Cpro immunoregulatory region. Mutations in the VP1 receptor-binding site can alter affinity for host receptors such as sialic acid, heparan sulfate, and MFSD6, thereby shaping viral entry and tissue tropism. Alterations in the 2Apro/TRAF3 cleavage site may impair proteolytic cleavage of host TRAF3, attenuating immune evasion and reducing viral pathogenicity. Variations in the 3Cpro region affect its efficiency in cleaving host proteins involved in translation and autophagy, ultimately modulating viral replication and antiviral responses. Finally, we propose that monitoring for mutations in these key virulence determinants, particularly within the surface-exposed VP1, is essential for effective outbreak preparedness.

Indexed as

Enterovirus D, HumanEnterovirus InfectionsGenetic VariationAnimalsGenome, ViralHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmune EvasionMutationViral ProteinsVirulenceVirus InternalizationVirus ReplicationViral ProteinsEnterovirus D68genomic variationnon-structural proteinspathogenicitystructural proteins

Identifiers

PMID41600837
PMCPMC12846453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.