Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600806›Full record

ArticleViruses2025

A Rapid, Cost-Effective RNA Recovery of Cowpea Mild Mottle Virus (CPMMV) Directly from PCR Tubes Adsorption for Routine-Scale Detection in Soybean.

Pedro Henrique Ribeiro, Marcos R Ribeiro-Junior, Bárbara R R Silveira, Francisco M Ochoa-Corona, Renate Krause-Sakate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pedro Henrique RibeiroDepartment of Plant Protection, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP 18610-307, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-1233-419X
Marcos R Ribeiro-JuniorInstitute for Biosecurity and Microbial Forensics (IBMF), Oklahoma State University (OSU), Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5024-1801
Bárbara R R SilveiraDepartment of Plant Protection, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP 18610-307, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-1207-4341
Francisco M Ochoa-CoronaInstitute for Biosecurity and Microbial Forensics (IBMF), Oklahoma State University (OSU), Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4112-8209
Renate Krause-SakateDepartment of Plant Protection, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP 18610-307, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7526-640X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2024/22251-0National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 304002/2022-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study describes an optimized plastic surface-based capsid protein adsorption/capturing method for detection of cowpea mild mottle virus (CPMMV) adapted from the direct antigen-capture method reported for the extraction of rose rosette virus (RRV) and other direct virus capturing attempts. Briefly, the method starts with sap incubation, removal of unbound residual tissue and inhibitors by washing, and the viral RNA release using nuclease-free water and heat, in the presence of an RNase inhibitor. The protocol's efficiency was assessed across different pH conditions, RNaseOUT concentrations, and reverse-transcriptase choices, and its performance was compared with commercial RNA-extraction methods. Three hundred thirty-two positive samples for CPMMV were processed using the optimized protocol (PBS-T, pH 7.4; RNaseOUT at 0.5 U/µL; and M-MLV reverse transcriptase). RT-PCR detection results were consistent with those obtained using the standard method. Cost estimates for tissue trapping indicate reductions of approximately 70% and 90% compared with the Qiagen RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the Bertheau method, respectively. The tissue-absorption protocol combines simplicity and low cost, making it particularly well suited for field diagnostics; by enabling rapid recovery of viral RNA without commercial kits and substantially reducing processing steps, it represents a practical, cost-effective alternative for routine CPMMV testing.

Indexed as

Glycine maxPlant DiseasesPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralAdsorptionCost-Benefit AnalysisRNA, Viralfield surveillancelow-cost diagnosticsRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID41600806
PMCPMC12846652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.