ArticleViruses2025
A Rapid, Cost-Effective RNA Recovery of Cowpea Mild Mottle Virus (CPMMV) Directly from PCR Tubes Adsorption for Routine-Scale Detection in Soybean.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study describes an optimized plastic surface-based capsid protein adsorption/capturing method for detection of cowpea mild mottle virus (CPMMV) adapted from the direct antigen-capture method reported for the extraction of rose rosette virus (RRV) and other direct virus capturing attempts. Briefly, the method starts with sap incubation, removal of unbound residual tissue and inhibitors by washing, and the viral RNA release using nuclease-free water and heat, in the presence of an RNase inhibitor. The protocol's efficiency was assessed across different pH conditions, RNaseOUT concentrations, and reverse-transcriptase choices, and its performance was compared with commercial RNA-extraction methods. Three hundred thirty-two positive samples for CPMMV were processed using the optimized protocol (PBS-T, pH 7.4; RNaseOUT at 0.5 U/µL; and M-MLV reverse transcriptase). RT-PCR detection results were consistent with those obtained using the standard method. Cost estimates for tissue trapping indicate reductions of approximately 70% and 90% compared with the Qiagen RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the Bertheau method, respectively. The tissue-absorption protocol combines simplicity and low cost, making it particularly well suited for field diagnostics; by enabling rapid recovery of viral RNA without commercial kits and substantially reducing processing steps, it represents a practical, cost-effective alternative for routine CPMMV testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.