ArticleViruses2025
Redesigning Isolation Practices: Evaluation of a Comprehensive Protocol for Respiratory Virus Control Including Cycle Threshold (Ct) Value Dynamics.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent literature has debunked the widespread hypothesis that viruses are primarily transmitted via droplets and not beyond 1.5 m, and transmission via contact has been downplayed. Hence, an evidence-based revision of the existing isolation guidelines for respiratory viruses was needed. Therefore, a completely new protocol for respiratory virus isolation in terms of personal protective equipment and patient room air purification was evaluated. Isolation relief criteria based on Ct values in follow-up sampling were assessed. A Ct value of <28 was employed as a proxy for potential active replication and associated transmissibility. Between 25% and 50% of patients who tested positive for RSV, HRV, hMPV, or SARS-CoV-2 continued to exhibit high viral loads on day 7 post-initial diagnosis, underscoring the potential for sustained infectivity. Hence, the discontinuation of isolation measures for these patients without follow-up testing may carry a considerable risk of ongoing viral transmission. On the contrary, only 7% of patients positive for Flu and 14% for PIV had a follow-up sample on day 7 with a Ct value of less than 28. Ct values increased more rapidly in influenza, indicating faster viral clearance compared to other respiratory viruses. Based on these results, the policy of a standard 7-day isolation period without follow-up testing could be adopted for influenza-positive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.