ReviewViruses2025
Key Challenges in Screening Blood Donors for Hepatitis B Virus.
Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technological advancements in blood donor screening have significantly improved blood safety. However, certain testing challenges and limitations continue to face blood banks in donor screening for the hepatitis B virus, resulting in occasional cases of transfusion transmission. These cases are mostly related to donors presenting within the window period and donors with occult hepatitis B infection. There are several other challenges that professionals in transfusion medicine, infectious diseases, gastroenterology, and public health must be aware of. Maintaining the highest test sensitivity is a key parameter for enhancing blood safety, and the review describes current recommendations in this regard, along with relevant advancements. The diversity of viral genotypes and the potential for mutations affecting the surface antigen may negatively affect the performance of both serologic and nucleic acid tests. Serologic tests may also be affected by several interferences, endogenous or exogenous to the sample. A clear understanding of these challenges is necessary to create effective policies and procedures and to properly manage atypical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.