ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Canine Hip Dysplasia: Comparison with FCI Radiographic Scoring System.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Canine hip dysplasia (CHD) is a common orthopedic condition characterized by joint laxity, abnormal femoral head development, and osteoarthritis. Radiography remains the gold standard in diagnosis; however, ultrasonography (US) can detect changes in bone and periarticular soft tissue earlier in CHD progression. Forty-four hips from twenty-two adult dogs of various breeds were graded according to the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) grading system, and grouped as normal (A, B) or dysplastic (C, D, E). Canine hip US evaluation, using the ventral femoral head-neck approach, included the following: capsule thickness at the femoral head index (CTFHi) and capsule thickness at the femoral head-neck index (CTFHNi), both measured in mm/body weight × 100; femoral head shape score (FHSs) and femoral head-neck transition score (FHNTs); and osteophyte score (Os). These findings were evaluated qualitatively and then converted into numerical scores. Twenty-three hips were graded on the FCI system as being normal, and twenty-one as dysplastic. Median values of the US parameters CTFHi, CTFHNi, FHSs, FHNTs, and Os were 2.02, 7.79, 1.00, 1.00, and 0.00 in the normal-hips group, and 3.11, 9.32, 3.00, 2.00, and 1.00 in the dysplastic-hips group. Significant differences were observed between most US parameters evaluated. Strong associations were found between CTFHi, FHNTs, and Os, indicating progressive bone remodeling. These findings support US usage as a potential tool for CHD diagnosis and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.