In one paragraphArticle in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
14 authors.
Sineenart PolyorachDepartment of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6220-4859 Wichai SuphalucksanaDepartment of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Ampon KlompanyaDepartment of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Chalermpon YuangklangDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Innovation and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Main Campus, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3844-1691 Metha WanapatTropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7633-052X Seangla CheasTropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.
Anusorn CherdthongTropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8719-4404 Sungchhang KangAgricultural Unit, Department of Education, National Institute of Education, Phnom Penh 12200, Cambodia.
Pongsatorn GununDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Sakon Nakhon Campus, Phangkhon, Sakon Nakhon 47160, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-1611 Nirawan GununDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, Udon Thani 41000, Thailand.
Suban FoiklangFaculty of Animal Science and Technology, Maejo University, Chiang Mai 50290, Thailand.
Phongthorn KongmunDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5766-9619 Nattaya MontriOffice of Administrative Interdisciplinary Program on Agricultural Technology, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7692-8919 Kanokrat SrikijkasemwatDepartment of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, School of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Funding
Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand Grant No. 2561-01-04-006
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
This study investigated how varying the ensiling period and the level of mixed microbes fermented liquid (MMFL) influences the chemical composition, in vitro degradability, rumen fermentation profile, and microbial ecology of fermented total mixed rations (FTMR). A completely randomized 4 × 4 factorial design was used, incorporating four fermentation durations (0, 7, 14, and 21 days) and four MMFL inclusion rates (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5% of DM). Both factors exerted significant effects on FTMR quality (
Indexed as
fermented total mixed rationin vitro gas productionmethane mitigationmixed microbes fermented liquidrumen fermentation
Identifiers
PMID41600663
PMCPMC12846394
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390