ArticleToxics2026
Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Classifying Diabetes Using Demographic, Clinical, Lifestyle, Anthropometric, and Environmental Exposure Factors.
Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined Effects of Metals and PFAS Exposure on Prevalent Diabetes.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- Central adiposity outperforms disordered eating behavior in predicting type 2 diabetes risk in young adults: an explainable machine learning approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes develops through a mix of clinical, metabolic, lifestyle, demographic, and environmental factors. Most current classification models focus on traditional biomedical indicators and do not include environmental exposure biomarkers. In this study, we develop and evaluate a supervised machine learning classification framework that integrates heterogeneous demographic, anthropometric, clinical, behavioral, and environmental exposure features to classify physician-diagnosed diabetes using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We analyzed NHANES 2017-2018 data for adults aged ≥18 years, addressed missingness using Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations, and corrected class imbalance via the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique. Model performance was evaluated using stratified ten-fold cross-validation across eight supervised classifiers: logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine, multilayer perceptron neural network (artificial neural network), k-nearest neighbors, naïve Bayes, and classification tree. Random Forest and XGBoost performed best on the balanced dataset, with ROC AUC values of 0.891 and 0.885, respectively, after imputation and oversampling. Feature importance analysis indicated that age, household income, and waist circumference contributed most strongly to diabetes classification. To assess out-of-sample generalization, we conducted an independent 80/20 hold-out evaluation. XGBoost achieved the highest overall accuracy and F1-score, whereas random forest attained the greatest sensitivity, demonstrating stable performance beyond cross-validation. These results indicate that incorporating environmental exposure biomarkers alongside clinical and metabolic features yields improved classification performance for physician-diagnosed diabetes. The findings support the inclusion of chemical exposure variables in population-level diabetes classification and underscore the value of integrating heterogeneous feature sets in machine learning-based risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.