Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600613›Full record

ArticleToxics2026

Direct Valorization of Biogas Residue: A Comparative Study on Facile Chemical Modifications for Superior Adsorption of Anionic Dyes.

Xin Luo, Wenxia Zhao, Lin Fu, Yun Deng, Weijie Xue, Changbo Zhang, Ian Beadham, Zhongyan Lu, Yuyao Liu, Fanshu Bi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xin LuoKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.
Wenxia ZhaoSchool of Environment and Ecology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Lin FuKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.
Yun DengSchool of Environment and Ecology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China.
Weijie XueKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.
Changbo ZhangKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-0247
Ian BeadhamSchool of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston Upon Thames KT1 2EE, UK.
Zhongyan LuGuangxi Tongyuan Information Technology Co., Ltd., Nanning 530200, China.
Yuyao LiuKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.ORCID 0009-0000-6179-712X
Fanshu BiKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.
Qingshuai WangKey Laboratory of Original Agro-Environmental Pollution Prevention and Control, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, Agro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA), Tianjin 300191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop a cost-effective and scalable modification strategy for valorizing lignin-rich biogas residue (BR) into high-performance adsorbents for anionic dye removal. To screen the optimal modification pathway, three distinct reagents, L-cysteine-based amino acid ionic liquids (AAILs, as green alternatives), conventional hydrochloric acid (HCl) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, as traditional modification reagents), were compared in modifying non-carbonized BR for Congo Red (CR) adsorption. Comprehensive characterizations and adsorption tests revealed that each modifier exerted unique effects: NaOH only caused mild surface etching with limited performance improvement; AAILs achieved moderate adsorption capacity via a green, mild route; while HCl modification (BR-HCl) stood out with the most superior performance through a "selective dissolution-pore reconstruction" mechanism. Notably, despite a modest specific surface area increase to 12.05 m

Indexed as

adsorptionadsorption isothermadsorption kineticsbiogas residuecongo red

Identifiers

PMID41600613
PMCPMC12846080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.