Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600581›Full record

ArticleToxics2025

Feasibility of Using Animal Manure and Manure-Based Fertilizer as Soil Amendments: Veterinary Drugs Occurrence and Ecological Risk.

Qingshan Li, Dapeng Zhang, Suzhen Yin, Yan Li, Xia Gao, Xiuhua Wu, Lihua Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qingshan LiCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan 250100, China.
Dapeng ZhangCollege of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan 250100, China.
Suzhen YinShandong Provincial Research Institute of Coal Geology Planning and Exploration, Jinan 250100, China.
Yan LiCollege of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan 250100, China.
Xia GaoShandong Agricultural Technology Center, Shandong Provincial Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Jinan 250013, China.
Xiuhua WuReserach and Information Managemet Division, Inner Mongolia Academy of Forestry, Hohhot 010010, China.
Lihua JiangCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan 250100, China.

Funding

Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University Start-Up Fund for Talented Scholars 2025GCCZR-33Shandong Eco-Agricultural Technology System-Specialist Position for Harmless Utilization of Livestock and Poultry Manure SDAIT-30-07the Inner Mongolia Science and Technology Program 2025YFHH0155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Veterinary drugs are widely present in animal manure and manure-based fertilizers, making their safety for use as soil amendments still ambiguous. This study investigated the concentrations of 17 typical veterinary drugs in animal manure and manure-based fertilizers from Shandong Province using solid-phase extraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and assessed their environmental risks to soil organisms based on risk quotient values. The established method demonstrated robust performance, with drug recovery rates ranging from 72.9% to 109%. Tetracyclines were identified as the most prevalent contaminants, with mean concentrations of 1522 μg/kg in animal manure and 144 μg/kg in manure-based fertilizers. Drug concentrations in manure-based fertilizers were generally lower than those in animal manure. Livestock manure contained higher drug concentrations compared to poultry manure. Influenced by farming practices, drug concentrations were higher in beef cattle manure than in dairy cattle manure, and higher in broiler manure than in layer manure. Manure-based fertilizers primarily derived their drug content from chicken, cattle, and sheep manure. Tetracyclines in swine and sheep manure posed high risks to soil organisms, while those in beef cattle manure and dairy cattle manure posed medium risks. In contrast, most drugs in manure-based fertilizers exhibited low risks. Comprehensive analysis of both concentration levels and ecological risks indicates that manure-based fertilizers represent a more feasible option for soil amendment. This study provides a theoretical foundation for better understanding the feasibility of applying animal manure and manure-based fertilizers to agricultural land.

Indexed as

ecological riskfertilizermanureoccurrenceveterinary drug

Identifiers

PMID41600581
PMCPMC12846102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.