Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600540›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence-Based Depression Detection.

Gabor Kiss, Patrik Viktor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabor KissInstitute of Safety Science and Cybersecurity, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0447-9376
Patrik ViktorKeleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Obuda University, 1034 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8689-2753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decisions made by pilots and drivers suffering from depression can endanger the lives of hundreds of people, as demonstrated by the tragedies of Germanwings flight 9525 and Air India flight 171. Since the detection of depression is currently based largely on subjective self-reporting, there is an urgent need for fast, objective, and reliable detection methods. In our study, we present an artificial intelligence-based system that combines iris-based identification with the analysis of pupillometric and eye movement biomarkers, enabling the real-time detection of physiological signs of depression before driving or flying. The two-module model was evaluated based on data from 242 participants: the iris identification module operated with an Equal Error Rate of less than 0.5%, while the depression-detecting CNN-LSTM network achieved 89% accuracy and an AUC value of 0.94. Compared to the neutral state, depressed individuals responded to negative news with significantly greater pupil dilation (+27.9% vs. +18.4%), while showing a reduced or minimal response to positive stimuli (-1.3% vs. +6.2%). This was complemented by slower saccadic movement and longer fixation time, which is consistent with the cognitive distortions characteristic of depression. Our results indicate that pupillometric deviations relative to individual baselines can be reliably detected and used with high accuracy for depression screening. The presented system offers a preventive safety solution that could reduce the number of accidents caused by human error related to depression in road and air traffic in the future.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDepressionAdultConvolutional Neural NetworksEye MovementsHumansIrisMalePupilartificial intelligenceaviationdepressionrecognitionroad transportsafety

Identifiers

PMID41600540
PMCPMC12845939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.