Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600529›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Sensor-Oriented Multimodal Medical Data Acquisition and Modeling Framework for Tumor Grading and Treatment Response Analysis.

Linfeng Xie, Shanhe Xiao, Bihong Ming, Zhe Xiang, Zibo Rui, Xinyi Liu, Yan Zhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Linfeng XieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Shanhe XiaoNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Bihong MingNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Zhe XiangNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Zibo RuiNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Xinyi LiuNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yan ZhanNational School of Development, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61202479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In precision oncology research, achieving joint modeling of tumor grading and treatment response, together with interpretable mechanism analysis, based on multimodal medical imaging and clinical data remains a challenging and critical problem. From a sensing perspective, these imaging and clinical data can be regarded as heterogeneous sensor-derived signals acquired by medical imaging sensors and clinical monitoring systems, providing continuous and structured observations of tumor characteristics and patient states. Existing approaches typically rely on invasive pathological grading, while grading prediction and treatment response modeling are often conducted independently. Moreover, multimodal fusion procedures generally lack explicit structural constraints, which limits their practical utility in clinical decision-making. To address these issues, a grade-guided multimodal collaborative modeling framework was proposed. Built upon mature deep learning models, including 3D ResNet-18, MLP, and CNN-Transformer, tumor grading was incorporated as a weakly supervised prior into the processes of multimodal feature fusion and treatment response modeling, thereby enabling an integrated solution for non-invasive grading prediction, treatment response subtype discovery, and intrinsic mechanism interpretation. Through a grade-guided feature fusion mechanism, discriminative information that is highly correlated with tumor malignancy and treatment sensitivity is emphasized in the multimodal joint representation, while irrelevant features are suppressed to prevent interference with model learning. Within a unified framework, grading prediction and grade-conditioned treatment response modeling are jointly realized. Experimental results on real-world clinical datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieved an accuracy of 84.6% and a kappa coefficient of 0.81 in the tumor-grading prediction task, indicating a high level of consistency with pathological grading. In the treatment response prediction task, the proposed model attained an AUC of 0.85, a precision of 0.81, and a recall of 0.79, significantly outperforming single-modality models, conventional early-fusion models, and multimodal CNN-Transformer models without grading constraints. In addition, treatment-sensitive and treatment-resistant subtypes identified under grading conditions exhibited stable and significant stratification differences in clustering consistency and survival analysis, validating the potential value of the proposed approach for clinical risk assessment and individualized treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Multimodal ImagingNeoplasmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansNeoplasm GradingPrecision Medicineclinical sensingmedical imaging sensorsmedical sensorsmultimodal sensing systemsprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID41600529
PMCPMC12846129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.