ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Fusing EEG Features Extracted by Microstate Analysis and Empirical Mode Decomposition for Diagnosis of Schizophrenia.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Comparative Analysis of EWT and EMD Techniques in the Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder Using EEG: Asymmetry Features and Explainability via SHAP.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate early diagnosis and precise assessment of disease severity are imperative for the treatment and rehabilitation of schizophrenia patients. To achieve this, we propose a computer-aided diagnostic method for schizophrenia that utilizes fusion features derived from microstate analysis and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) based on Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. At the same time, the obtained fusion features from microstate analysis and EMD are input into the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) feature selection algorithm to reduce the dimensionality of feature vectors. Finally, the reduced feature vector is fed to a Logistic Regression classifier to classify SCH and healthy EEG signals. In addition, the ability of the integrated features to distinguish the severity of schizophrenia symptoms was evaluated, and the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) algorithm was used to analyze the importance of the classification features that differentiate schizophrenia symptoms. Experimental results from both public and private datasets demonstrate the efficacy of EMD features in identifying healthy controls, while microstate features excel in classifying the severity of symptoms among schizophrenia patients. The classification evaluation metrics of the fused features significantly outperform those obtained using EMD or microstate analysis features independently. The fusion feature method proposed in this study achieved accuracies of 100% and 90.7% for the classification of schizophrenia in public datasets and private datasets, respectively, and an accuracy of 93.6% for the classification of schizophrenia symptoms in private datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.