ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A PI-Dual-STGCN Fault Diagnosis Model Based on the SHAP-LLM Joint Explanation Framework.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a PI-Dual-STGCN fault diagnosis model based on a SHAP-LLM joint explanation framework to address issues such as the lack of transparency in the diagnostic process of deep learning models and the weak interpretability of diagnostic results. PI-Dual-STGCN enhances the interpretability of graph data by introducing physical constraints and constructs a dual-graph architecture based on physical topology graphs and signal similarity graphs. The experimental results show that the dual-graph complementary architecture enhances diagnostic accuracy to 99.22%. Second, a general-purpose SHAP-LLM explanation framework is designed: Explainable AI (XAI) technology is used to analyze the decision logic of the diagnostic model and generate visual explanations, establishing a hierarchical knowledge base that includes performance metrics, explanation reliability, and fault experience. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology is innovatively combined to integrate model performance and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) reliability assessment through the main report prompt, while the sub-report prompt enables detailed fault analysis and repair decision generation. Finally, experiments demonstrate that this approach avoids the uncertainty of directly using large models for fault diagnosis: we delegate all fault diagnosis tasks and core explainability tasks to more mature deep learning algorithms and XAI technology and only leverage the powerful textual reasoning capabilities of large models to process pre-quantified, fact-based textual information (e.g., model performance metrics, SHAP explanation results). This method enhances diagnostic transparency through XAI-generated visual and quantitative explanations of model decision logic while reducing the risk of large model hallucinations by restricting large models to reasoning over grounded, fact-based textual content rather than direct fault diagnosis, providing verifiable intelligent decision support for industrial fault diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.