Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600517›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A PI-Dual-STGCN Fault Diagnosis Model Based on the SHAP-LLM Joint Explanation Framework.

Zheng Zhao, Shuxia Ye, Liang Qi, Hao Ni, Siyu Fei, Zhe Tong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zheng ZhaoSchool of Automation, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6266-5863
Shuxia YeSchool of Automation, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.ORCID 0009-0005-9813-0739
Liang QiSchool of Automation, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3678-4893
Hao NiSchool of Automation, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.
Siyu FeiSchool of Automation, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.
Zhe TongSchool of Automation, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes a PI-Dual-STGCN fault diagnosis model based on a SHAP-LLM joint explanation framework to address issues such as the lack of transparency in the diagnostic process of deep learning models and the weak interpretability of diagnostic results. PI-Dual-STGCN enhances the interpretability of graph data by introducing physical constraints and constructs a dual-graph architecture based on physical topology graphs and signal similarity graphs. The experimental results show that the dual-graph complementary architecture enhances diagnostic accuracy to 99.22%. Second, a general-purpose SHAP-LLM explanation framework is designed: Explainable AI (XAI) technology is used to analyze the decision logic of the diagnostic model and generate visual explanations, establishing a hierarchical knowledge base that includes performance metrics, explanation reliability, and fault experience. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology is innovatively combined to integrate model performance and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) reliability assessment through the main report prompt, while the sub-report prompt enables detailed fault analysis and repair decision generation. Finally, experiments demonstrate that this approach avoids the uncertainty of directly using large models for fault diagnosis: we delegate all fault diagnosis tasks and core explainability tasks to more mature deep learning algorithms and XAI technology and only leverage the powerful textual reasoning capabilities of large models to process pre-quantified, fact-based textual information (e.g., model performance metrics, SHAP explanation results). This method enhances diagnostic transparency through XAI-generated visual and quantitative explanations of model decision logic while reducing the risk of large model hallucinations by restricting large models to reasoning over grounded, fact-based textual content rather than direct fault diagnosis, providing verifiable intelligent decision support for industrial fault diagnosis.

Indexed as

explainabilityexplainable AIfault diagnosisLLMSHAP

Identifiers

PMID41600517
PMCPMC12846048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.