ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Study on Rejecting Non-Target and Misclassified Motions for Robust Tactile-Sensor-Based Prosthetic Hand Control.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable motion classification is essential for practical prosthetic-hand control. Unintended activations caused by ambiguous motions, unknown motions, or non-target body movements can degrade controllability and compromise user safety. Mechanical-sensing approaches are attracting attention as alternatives or complements to surface electromyography, and tactile-sensor-based methods represent one such direction. However, despite extensive studies on prosthetic control, systematic investigations of computationally lightweight motion-rejection strategies remain limited. This study investigates rejection mechanisms to improve the robustness of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) tactile-sensor-based prosthetic control. The proposed approach selectively withholds outputs for misclassified and non-target inputs. We compare three mechanisms: (1) one-class support vector machine (OCSVM) outlier detection, (2) entropy-based rejection using a multilayer perceptron (BPNN-Entropy), and (3) a parameter-free decision-consistency check for one-vs-rest support vector machines (SVMs) that withholds classification when the output sign pattern is inconsistent (one-vs-rest reject option (OvR-RO); proposed). Performance is evaluated for three sources of unintended activation: ambiguous target trials (retrospectively defined), unknown motions excluded from training, and non-target body movements. The results show that OvR-RO achieves a favorable balance between rejection rate and rejection precision for ambiguous motions, while maintaining responsiveness. Overall, explicitly rejecting misclassified and non-target motions is effective for enhancing robustness in tactile-sensor-based prosthetic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.