Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600508›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Automated Classification of Humpback Whale Calls Using Deep Learning: A Comparative Study of Neural Architectures and Acoustic Feature Representations.

Jack C Johnson, Yue Rong

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jack C JohnsonSchool of Electrical Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences (EECMS), Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-8857-8829
Yue RongSchool of Electrical Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences (EECMS), Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5831-7479

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) using hydrophones enables collecting acoustic data to be collected in large and diverse quantities, necessitating the need for a reliable automated classification system. This paper presents a data-processing pipeline and a set of neural networks designed for a humpback-whale-detection system. A collection of audio segments is compiled using publicly available audio repositories and extensively curated via manual methods, undertaking thorough examination, editing and clipping to produce a dataset minimizing bias or categorization errors. An array of standard data-augmentation techniques are applied to the collected audio, diversifying and expanding the original dataset. Multiple neural networks are designed and trained using TensorFlow 2.20.0 and Keras 3.13.1 frameworks, resulting in a custom curated architecture layout based on research and iterative improvements. The pre-trained model MobileNetV2 is also included for further analysis. Model performance demonstrates a strong dependence on both feature representation and network architecture. Mel spectrogram inputs consistently outperformed MFCC (Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients) features across all model types. The highest performance was achieved by the pretrained MobileNetV2 using mel spectrograms without augmentation, reaching a test accuracy of 99.01% with balanced precision and recall of 99% and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.98. The custom CNN with mel spectrograms also achieved strong performance, with 98.92% accuracy and a false negative rate of only 0.75%. In contrast, models trained with MFCC representations exhibited consistently lower robustness and higher false negative rates. These results highlight the comparative strengths of the evaluated feature representations and network architectures for humpback whale detection.

Indexed as

AcousticsDeep LearningHumpback WhaleVocalization, AnimalAnimalsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksNeural Networks, Computeracoustic monitoringclassificationconvolutional neural network (CNN)humpback whalemarine bioacousticsmel spectrogramMFCC (Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coeffucient)spectrogramvision transformer (ViT)

Identifiers

PMID41600508
PMCPMC12845957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.