ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Review of Fault Diagnosis Methods: From Traditional Machine Learning to Large Language Model Fusion Paradigm.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Propeller Fault Classification for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Explainable Artificial Intelligence-Based Feature-Model Matching.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Decoupled Graph Attention Modeling and Anomaly Traceability Method for Multisystem Coupling in SLM Equipment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Leakage-Resistant Multi-Sensor Bearing Fault Diagnosis via Adaptive Time-Frequency Graph Learning and Sensor Reliability-Aware Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Digital Twin-Driven Dual-Stage Adversarial Transfer Learning Method for Lamb Wave-Based Structural Damage Localization Under Limited Sensing Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fault diagnosis is a core technology ensuring the safe and efficient operation of industrial systems. A paradigm shift has been observed wherein traditional signal analysis has been replaced by intelligent, algorithm-driven approaches. In recent years, large language models, digital twins, and knowledge graphs have been introduced. A new stage of intelligent integration has been reached that is characterized by data-driven methods, knowledge guidance, and physical-virtual fusion. In the present paper, the evolutionary context of fault diagnosis technologies was systematically reviewed, with a focus on the theoretical methods and application practices of traditional machine learning, digital twins, knowledge graphs, and large language models. First, the research background, core objectives, and development history of fault diagnosis were described. Second, the principles, industrial applications, and limitations of supervised and unsupervised learning were analyzed. Third, innovative uses were examined involving physical-virtual mapping in digital twins, knowledge modeling in knowledge graphs, and feature learning in large language models. Subsequently, a multi-dimensional comparison framework was constructed to analyze the performance indicators, applicable scenarios, and collaborative potential of different technologies. Finally, the key challenges faced in the current fault diagnosis field were summarized. These included data quality, model generalization, and knowledge reuse. Future directions driven by the fusion of large language models, digital twins, and knowledge graphs were also outlined. A comprehensive technical map was established for fault diagnosis researchers, as well as an up-to-date reference. Theoretical innovation and engineering deployment of intelligent fault diagnosis are intended to be supported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.