ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Acoustic Signatures in Laser-Induced Plasmas for Detection of Explosives in Traces.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this work we report the results of analysis of the acoustic signal generated by the interaction of a nanosecond laser pulse (30 mJ, 1064 nm) with various residues placed on a silica wafer. The signal was captured by a unidirectional microphone placed 30 mm from the laser-generated plasma. The examined sample classes, other than the clean wafer, included particles from soils and rocks, carbonates, nitro precursors, ash, coal, smeared diesel, and particles of explosives. We tested three types of explosives, namely PETN, RDX, and HMX, having different origins. For the explosives, the acoustic signal showed a faster rise, larger amplitude, different width, and attenuation compared with the other sample classes. By subtracting the acoustic signal from the wafer at the same position, obtained after four cleaning laser pulses, the contribution of echoes was eliminated and true differences between the residue and substrate became evident. Through four different features in the subtracted signal, it was possible to classify explosives without the presence of false positives; the estimated limit of detection was 15 ng, 9.6 ng, and 18 ng for PETN, RDX, and HMX, respectively, where the mass was extrapolated from nano-printed samples and LIBS spectra acquired simultaneously. Furthermore, HMX was distinguished from the other two explosives in 90% of the cases; diesel and coal were also recognized. We also found that explosives deposited through wet transfer behaved as inert substances for the tested masses up to 30 ng.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.