Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600460›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Lightweight Modified Adaptive UNet for Nucleus Segmentation.

Md Rahat Kader Khan, Tamador Mohaidat, Kasem Khalil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Rahat Kader KhanElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1555-6847
Tamador MohaidatElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-2269-3607
Kasem KhalilElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9659-8566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell nucleus segmentation in microscopy images is an initial step in the quantitative analysis of imaging data, which is crucial for diverse biological and biomedical applications. While traditional machine learning methodologies have demonstrated limitations, recent advances in U-Net models have yielded promising improvements. However, it is noteworthy that these models perform well on balanced datasets, where the ratio of background to foreground pixels is equal. Within the realm of microscopy image segmentation, state-of-the-art models often encounter challenges in accurately predicting small foreground entities such as nuclei. Moreover, the majority of these models exhibit large parameter sizes, predisposing them to overfitting issues. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces a novel architecture, called mA-UNet, designed to excel in predicting small foreground elements. Additionally, a data preprocessing strategy inspired by road segmentation approaches is employed to address dataset imbalance issues. The experimental results show that the MIoU score attained by the mA-UNet model stands at 95.50%, surpassing the nearest competitor, UNet++, on the 2018 Data Science Bowl dataset. Ultimately, our proposed methodology surpasses all other state-of-the-art models in terms of both quantitative and qualitative evaluations. The mA-UNet model is also implemented in VHDL on the Zynq UltraScale+ FPGA, demonstrating its ability to perform complex computations with minimal hardware resources, as well as its efficiency and scalability on advanced FPGA platforms.

Indexed as

deep learningimage segmentationnucleus segmentationUNet

Identifiers

PMID41600460
PMCPMC12845766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.