Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600454›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Energy-Efficient Automated Detection of OPGW Features for Sustainable UAV-Based Inspection.

Xiaoling Yan, Wuxing Mao, Xiao Li, Ruiming Huang, Chi Ye, Faguang Li, Zheyu Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoling YanGuangzhou Electric Power Design Institute, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Wuxing MaoGuangzhou Electric Power Design Institute, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Xiao LiGuangzhou Electric Power Design Institute, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Ruiming HuangGuangzhou Electric Power Design Institute, Guangzhou 510630, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0807-1036
Chi YeGuangzhou Electric Power Design Institute, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Faguang LiSchool of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Zheyu FanSchool of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based inspection is crucial for the maintenance and monitoring of high-voltage transmission lines, but detecting small objects in inspection images presents significant challenges, especially under complex backgrounds and varying lighting. These challenges are particularly evident when detecting the wire features of optical fiber composite overhead ground wire and conventional ground wires. Optical fiber composite overhead ground wire (OPGW) is a specialized cable designed to replace conventional shield wires on power utility towers. It contains one or more optical fibers housed in a protective tube, surrounded by layers of aluminum-clad steel and/or aluminum alloy wires, ensuring robust mechanical strength for grounding and high-bandwidth capabilities for remote sensing and control. Existing detection methods often struggle with low accuracy, insufficient performance, and high computational demands when dealing with small objects. To address these issues, this paper proposes an energy-efficient OPGW feature detection model for UAV-based inspection. The model incorporates a Feature Enhancement Module (FEM) to replace the C3K2 module in the sixth layer of the YOLO11 backbone, improving multi-scale feature extraction. A P2 shallow detection head is added to enhance the perception of small and edge features. Additionally, the traditional Intersection over Union (IoU) loss is replaced with Normalized Wasserstein Distance (NWD) loss function, which improves boundary regression accuracy for small objects. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves a mAP50 of 78.3% and mAP50-95 of 52.0%, surpassing the baseline by 2.3% and 1.1%, respectively. The proposed model offers the advantages of high detection accuracy and low computational resource requirements, providing a practical solution for sustainable UAV-based inspections.

Indexed as

OPGWsmall object detectionUAV-based inspectionYOLO11

Identifiers

PMID41600454
PMCPMC12845664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.