Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600329›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Low-Cost Sensors in 5G RF-EMF Exposure Monitoring: Validity and Challenges.

Phoka C Rathebe, Mota Kholopo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Phoka C RathebeDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Doornfontein Campus, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9095-354X
Mota KholopoDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Doornfontein Campus, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deployment of 5G networks has transformed the landscape of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure patterns, shifting from high-power macro base stations to dense networks of small, beamforming cells. This review critically assesses the validity, challenges, and research gaps of low-cost RF-EMF sensors used for 5G exposure monitoring. An analysis of over 60 studies covering Sub-6 GHz and emerging mmWave systems shows that well-calibrated sensors can achieve measurement deviations of ±3-6 dB compared to professional instruments like the Narda SRM-3006, with long-term calibration drift less than 0.5 dB per month and RMS reproducibility around 5%. Typical outdoor 5G FR1 exposure levels range from 0.01 to 0.5 W/m

Indexed as

5G RF-EMF monitoringcalibration uncertaintycitizen sciencelow-cost sensorsparticipatory monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41600329
PMCPMC12845799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.