ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pose-Based Static Sign Language Recognition with Deep Learning for Turkish, Arabic, and American Sign Languages.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in artificial intelligence have significantly enhanced communication for individuals with hearing impairments. This study presents a robust cross-lingual Sign Language Recognition (SLR) framework for Turkish, American English, and Arabic sign languages. The system utilizes the lightweight MediaPipe library for efficient hand landmark extraction, ensuring stable and consistent feature representation across diverse linguistic contexts. Datasets were meticulously constructed from nine public-domain sources (four Arabic, three American, and two Turkish). The final training data comprises curated image datasets, with frames for each language carefully selected from varying angles and distances to ensure high diversity. A comprehensive comparative evaluation was conducted across three state-of-the-art deep learning architectures-ConvNeXt (CNN-based), Swin Transformer (ViT-based), and Vision Mamba (SSM-based)-all applied to identical feature sets. The evaluation demonstrates the superior performance of contemporary vision Transformers and state space models in capturing subtle spatial cues across diverse sign languages. Our approach provides a comparative analysis of model generalization capabilities across three distinct sign languages, offering valuable insights for model selection in pose-based SLR systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.