ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Automated Detection of Normal, Atrial, and Ventricular Premature Beats from Single-Lead ECG Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate detection of premature atrial contractions (PACs) and premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in single-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) is crucial for early identification of patients at risk for atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and other adverse outcomes. In this work, we present a fully convolutional one-dimensional U-Net that reframes beat classification as a segmentation task and directly detects normal beats, PACs, and PVCs from raw ECG signals. The architecture employs a ConvNeXt V2 encoder with simple decoder blocks and does not rely on explicit R-peak detection, handcrafted features, or fixed-length input windows. The model is trained on the Icentia11k database and an in-house single-lead ECG dataset that emphasizes challenging, noisy recordings, and is validated on the CPSC2020 database. Generalization is assessed across several benchmark and clinical datasets, including MIT-BIH Arrhythmia (ADB), MIT 11, AHA, NST, SVDB, CST STRIPS, and CPSC2020. The proposed method achieves near-perfect QRS detection (sensitivity and precision up to 0.999) and competitive PVC performance, with sensitivity ranging from 0.820 (AHA) to 0.986 (MIT 11) and precision up to 0.993 (MIT 11). PAC detection is more variable, with sensitivities between 0.539 and 0.797 and precisions between 0.751 and 0.910, yet the resulting F1-score of 0.72 on SVDB exceeds that of previously published approaches. Model interpretability is addressed using Layer-wise Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (LayerGradCAM), which confirms physiologically plausible attention to QRS complexes for PVCs and to P-waves for PACs. Overall, the proposed framework provides a robust, interpretable, and hardware-efficient solution for joint PAC and PVC detection in noisy, single-lead ECG recordings, suitable for integration into Holter and wearable monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.