ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Low-Cost Optical-Inertial Point Cloud Acquisition and Sketch System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper proposes an optical three-dimensional (3D) point cloud acquisition and sketching system, which is not limited by the measurement size, unlike traditional 3D object measurement techniques. The system employs an optical displacement sensor for surface displacement scanning and a six-axis inertial sensor (accelerometer and gyroscope) for spatial attitude perception. A microprocessor control unit (MCU) is responsible for acquiring, merging, and calculating data from the sensors, converting it into 3D point clouds. Butterworth filtering and Mahoney complementary filtering are used for sensor signal preprocessing and calculation, respectively. Furthermore, a human-machine interface is designed to visualize the point cloud and display the scanning path and measurement trajectory in real time. Compared to existing works in the literature, this system has a simpler hardware architecture, more efficient algorithms, and better operation, inspection, and observation features. The experimental results show that the maximum measurement error on 2D planes is 4.7% with a root mean square (RMS) error of 2.1%, corresponding to the reference length of 10.3 cm. For 3D objects, the maximum measurement error is 5.3% with the RMS error of 2.4%, corresponding to the reference length of 9.3 cm. Finally, it was verified that this system can also be applied to large-sized 3D objects for outlines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.