ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Interpretable Biomechanical Feature Selection for VR Exercise Assessment Using SHAP and LDA.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) technologies are increasingly applied in rehabilitation, offering interactive physical and spatial exercises. A major challenge remains the objective assessment of human movement quality (HMQA). This study aimed to identify biomechanical features differentiating correct and incorrect execution of a lateral lunge and to determine the minimal number of sensors required for reliable VR-based motion analysis, prioritising interpretability. Thirty-two healthy adults (mean age: 26.4 ± 8.5 years) performed 211 repetitions recorded with the HTC Vive Tracker system (7 sensors + headset). Repetitions were classified by a physiotherapist using video observation and predefined criteria. The analysis included joint angles, angular velocities and accelerations, and Euclidean distances between 28 sensor pairs, evaluated with Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Angular features achieved higher LDA performance (F1 = 0.89) than distance-based features (F1 = 0.78), which proved more stable and less sensitive to calibration errors. Comparison of SHAP and LDA showed high agreement in identifying key features, including hip flexion, knee rotation acceleration, and spatial relations between headset and foot or shank sensors. The findings indicate that simplified sensor configurations may provide reliable diagnostic information, highlighting opportunities for interpretable VR-based rehabilitation systems in home and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.