ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
ROS 2-Based Architecture for Autonomous Driving Systems: Design and Implementation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Structured High-Frequency Disturbances on Linear Identification of Lateral Vehicle Dynamics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interest in the adoption of autonomous vehicles (AVs) continues to grow. It is essential to design new software architectures that meet stringent real-time, safety, and scalability requirements while integrating heterogeneous hardware and software solutions from different vendors and developers. This paper presents a lightweight, modular, and scalable architecture grounded in Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) principles and implemented in ROS 2 (Robot Operating System 2). The proposed design leverages ROS 2's Data Distribution System-based Quality-of-Service model to provide reliable communication, structured lifecycle management, and fault containment across distributed compute nodes. The architecture is organized into Perception, Planning, and Control layers with decoupled sensor access paths to satisfy heterogeneous frequency and hardware constraints. The decision-making core follows an event-driven policy that prioritizes fresh updates without enforcing global synchronization, applying zero-order hold where inputs are not refreshed. The architecture was validated on a 1:10-scale autonomous vehicle operating on a city-like track. The test environment covered canonical urban scenarios (lane-keeping, obstacle avoidance, traffic-sign recognition, intersections, overtaking, parking, and pedestrian interaction), with absolute positioning provided by an indoor GPS (Global Positioning System) localization setup. This work shows that the end-to-end Perception-Planning pipeline consistently met worst-case deadlines, yielding deterministic behaviour even under stress. The proposed architecture can be deemed compliant with real-time application standards for our use case on the 1:10 test vehicle, providing a robust foundation for deployment and further refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.