Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600239›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Hybrid Federated Learning Framework for Enhancing Privacy and Robustness in Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring.

Jing Rong, Qiuzhan Zhou, Huinan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing RongCollege of Communication Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Qiuzhan ZhouCollege of Communication Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.
Huinan WuCollege of Communication Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.ORCID 0009-0009-1688-5679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM), as a key technology in smart-grid advanced metering infrastructure, aims to disaggregate mains power from smart meters into individual load-level power consumption. Traditional NILM methods require centralizing sensitive measurement data from users, which poses significant privacy risks. Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training without centralized measurement data, effectively preserving privacy. However, FL-based NILM systems face serious threats from attacks such as model inversion and parameter poisoning, and rely heavily on the availability of a central server, whose failure may compromise measurement robustness. This paper proposes a hybrid FL framework that dynamically switches between centralized FL (CFL) and decentralized FL (DFL) modes, enhancing measurement privacy and system robustness simultaneously. In CFL mode, layer-sensitive pruning and robust parameter aggregation methods are developed to defend against model inversion and parameter poisoning attacks; even with 30% malicious clients, the proposed defense limits the increases in key error metrics to under 15.4%. In DFL mode, a graph attention network (GAT)-based dynamic topology adapts to mitigate topology poisoning attacks, achieving an approximately 17.2% reduction in MAE after an attack and rapidly restoring model performance. Extensive evaluations using public datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly enhances the robustness of smart-grid measurements and effectively safeguards measurement privacy.

Indexed as

federated learningmodel robustnessnon-intrusive load monitoring (NILM)privacy preservationsmart-grid advanced metering infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID41600239
PMCPMC12846191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.