ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Feasibility Study of Using an In-Ear EEG System for a Quantitative Assessment of Stress and Mental Workload.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Full-Stack Architectures for Intelligent Brain-Computer Interfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While electroencephalography (EEG) is effective for assessing stress and mental workload, its widespread adoption is currently hindered by the complex setup of most existing EEG systems. This article presents a new in-ear EEG system and investigates its feasibility for developing robust models to quantify stress and mental workload levels. The system consists of a single-channel EEG acquisition device that has a similar form factor as user-generic earpieces. All electrodes including passive, reference and bias electrodes were put on the ear, which optimized the device's usability. We validated the system through two experiments with 66 subjects to collect EEG data under varying stress and mental workload conditions. We developed classification and regression models to predict stress and mental workload levels from the data. Cross-subject stress classification achieved 77% accuracy, while within-subject stress regression yielded an average R2 of 0.76 ± 0.20. Two-class mental workload level classification reached accuracies between 70% and 80% for the arithmetic and finger tapping tasks. Feature importance analysis revealed that frequency-domain EEG features, particularly in the alpha and beta bands, significantly contributed to the models' performance. However, we observed lower within-subject feature variation and model accuracy for the mental rotation, potentially due to the distance between brain regions engaged and the device's recording site. Our findings demonstrate the potential of using the presented EEG device to monitor stress and mental workload in real-time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.