ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Review of In Situ Quality Monitoring in Additive Manufacturing Using Acoustic Emission Technology.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has emerged as a pivotal technology in component fabrication, renowned for its capabilities in freeform fabrication, material efficiency, and integrated design-to-manufacturing processes. As a critical branch of AM, metal additive manufacturing (MAM) has garnered significant attention for producing metal parts. However, process anomalies during MAM can pose safety risks, while internal defects in as-built parts detrimentally affect their service performance. These concerns underscore the necessity for robust in-process monitoring of both the MAM process and the quality of the resulting components. This review first delineates common MAM techniques and popular in-process monitoring methods. It then elaborates on the fundamental principles of acoustic emission (AE), including the configuration of AE systems and methods for extracting characteristic AE parameters. The core of the review synthesizes applications of AE technology in MAM, categorizing them into three key aspects: (1) hardware setup, which involves a comparative analysis of sensor selection, mounting strategies, and noise suppression techniques; (2) parametric characterization, which establishes correlations between AE features and process dynamics (e.g., process parameter deviations, spattering, melting/pool stability) as well as defect formation (e.g., porosity and cracking); and (3) intelligent monitoring, which focuses on the development of classification models and the integration of feedback control systems. By providing a systematic overview, this review aims to highlight the potential of AE as a powerful tool for real-time quality assurance in MAM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.