ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Enhancing EEG Decoding with Selective Augmentation Integration.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning holds considerable promise for electroencephalography (EEG) analysis but faces challenges due to scarce and noisy EEG data, and the limited generality of existing data augmentation techniques. To address these issues, we propose an end-to-end EEG augmentation framework with an adaptive mechanism. This approach utilizes contrastive learning to mitigate representational distortions caused by augmentation, thereby strengthening the encoder's feature learning. A selective augmentation strategy is further incorporated to dynamically determine optimal augmentation combinations based on performance. We also introduce NeuroBrain, a novel neural architecture specifically designed for auditory EEG decoding. It effectively captures both local and global dependencies within EEG signals. Comprehensive evaluations on the SparrKULee and WithMe datasets confirm the superiority of our proposed framework and architecture, demonstrating a 29.42% performance gain over HappyQuokka and a 5.45% accuracy improvement compared to EEGNet. These results validate our method's efficacy in tackling key challenges in EEG analysis and advancing the state of the art.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.