ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Performance Analysis of Explainable Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection Systems for IoT Networks: A Systematic Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Architectures, Datasets, and Emerging Trends.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Structural impact of non-IID heterogeneity on federated behavioral anomaly detection in IoT and IoMT systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The opaque nature of black-box deep learning (DL) models poses significant challenges for intrusion detection systems (IDSs) in Internet of Things (IoT) networks, where transparency, trust, and operational reliability are critical. Although explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been increasingly adopted to enhance interpretability, its impact on detection performance and computational efficiency in resource-constrained IoT environments remains insufficiently understood. This systematic review investigates the performance of an explainable deep learning-based IDS for IoT networks by analyzing trade-offs among detection accuracy, computational overhead, and explanation quality. Following the PRISMA methodology, 129 peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2025 are systematically analyzed to address key research questions related to XAI technique trade-offs, deep learning architecture performance, post-deployment XAI evaluation practices, and deployment bottlenecks. The findings reveal a pronounced imbalance in existing approaches, where high detection accuracy is often achieved at the expense of computational efficiency and rigorous explainability evaluation, limiting practical deployment on IoT edge devices. To address these gaps, this review proposes two conceptual contributions: (i) an XAI evaluation framework that standardizes post-deployment evaluation categories for explainability, and (ii) the Unified Explainable IDS Evaluation Framework (UXIEF), which models the fundamental trilemma between detection performance, resource efficiency, and explanation quality in IoT IDSs. By systematically highlighting performance-efficiency gaps, methodological shortcomings, and practical deployment challenges, this review provides a structured foundation and actionable insights for the development of trustworthy, efficient, and deployable explainable IDS solutions in IoT ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.