Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41600151›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Research on Control Strategy of Lower Limb Exoskeleton Robots: A Review.

Xin Xu, Changbing Chen, Zuo Sun, Wenhao Xian, Long Ma, Yingjie Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin XuChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.
Changbing ChenChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.
Zuo SunChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.
Wenhao XianChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.
Long MaChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.
Yingjie LiuChina Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China.

Funding

This research was funded by the Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Fund Special Project of CCTEG 2023-2-TD-KJHZ002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an aging population and the high incidence of neurological diseases, rehabilitative lower limb exoskeleton robots, as a wearable assistance device, present important application prospects in gait training and human function recovery. As the core of human-computer interaction, control strategy directly determines the exoskeleton's ability to perceive and respond to human movement intentions. This paper focuses on the control strategies of rehabilitative lower limb exoskeleton robots. Based on the typical hierarchical control architecture of "perception-decision-execution," it systematically reviews recent research progress centered around four typical control tasks: trajectory reproduction, motion following, Assist-As-Needed (AAN), and motion intention prediction. It emphasizes analyzing the core mechanisms, applicable scenarios, and technical characteristics of different control strategies. Furthermore, from the perspectives of drive system and control coupling, multi-source perception, and the universality and individual adaptability of control algorithms, it summarizes the key challenges and common technical constraints currently faced by control strategies. This article innovatively separates the end-effector control strategy from the hardware implementation to provide support for a universal control framework for exoskeletons.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceLower ExtremityRoboticsAlgorithmsGaitHumansadaptive controlcontrol strategyend-effector controlhuman–robot interactionlower limb exoskeleton robots

Identifiers

PMID41600151
PMCPMC12845874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.