ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Experimental Study on Dual-Structure Polymer Optical Fiber Sensors for Turbidity Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive investigation of turbidity monitoring using two different types of polymer optical fiber (POF) sensors: the reflection-refraction type (RR-POF) and the gap type (Gap-POF). Both sensors were used to visualize and monitor the turbidity changes in suspensions with varying concentrations and different particle compositions, namely silica powder and clay particles. The experiments were conducted by introducing silica powder and clay into water at various concentrations, and the resulting turbidity was measured using both types of POF sensors. The results revealed a significant correlation between particle concentration and light intensity for both kinds of POF sensors. As the particle concentration increased, the light intensity decreased due to increased scattering and absorption effects. For both silica powder and clay suspensions, the light intensity stabilized at lower values as the concentration increased, with the Gap-POF sensor exhibiting higher sensitivity to turbidity changes, particularly at high particle concentrations. Additionally, the study found that the particle composition influenced the sensor response. Silica powder particles caused more irregular fluctuations in light intensity at higher concentrations due to their larger particle size and tendency to aggregate, while clay particles, due to their smaller size and better dispersion, resulted in more stable and gradual changes in light intensity. This highlighted the differences in optical responses between different particle types. Furthermore, the multi-wavelength measurements showed consistent results, with white and green lights exhibiting the strongest response to turbidity changes, while red and blue lights were less sensitive. This wavelength-dependent response was attributed to the scattering and absorption properties of the particles in the suspensions. Both RR-POF and Gap-POF sensors proved to be effective for turbidity monitoring, with Gap-POF demonstrating superior performance in high-concentration suspensions. The findings suggest that POF sensors, particularly Gap-POF, are highly suitable for real-time turbidity monitoring in various particle suspension systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.