ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Phage Therapy at the Crossroads Between Clinical Promise and Regulatory Challenge.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiota Alterations in People Living With HIV: Dysbiosis, Immune Dysfunction and Therapeutic Perspectives.Reviews in medical virology · 2026Review
- UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bacteriophage therapy for antimicrobial-resistant, biofilm‑associated diabetic foot infection: delivery routes, phage antibiotic synergy, and practical wound‑care integration.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Current Recommendations, Antibiotic Resistance, and Emerging Treatments for Gram-Positive Ocular Infections in the United States.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Phage Therapy in Gastrointestinal Diseases: Current Status and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Editorial: Innovative antibiofilm strategies: advancing the management of microbial biofilm infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteriophage (phage) therapy, including monophage preparations, phage cocktails, engineered phages, and phage-derived enzymes, has re-emerged as a potential option for difficult-to-treat and biofilm-associated infections in the context of rising antimicrobial resistance. Recent scientific and regulatory developments, such as the 2024 World Health Organization Bacterial Priority Pathogens List and the introduction of the European Pharmacopoeia general chapter 5.31 on phage therapy medicinal products, highlight the growing interest in establishing quality, safety, and governance standards for clinical implementation. This narrative review provides an overview of current clinical applications of phage therapy, drawing on published case reports, case series, early-phase clinical studies, and regulatory experiences across different healthcare settings. Clinical use has been reported in respiratory, urinary tract, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and device-associated infections, particularly in cases involving multidrug-resistant pathogens, often in combination with antibiotics. At the same time, the biological characteristics of phages, such as strain specificity, adaptive composition of phage cocktails, and the need for individualized formulations, pose significant regulatory and translational challenges. Access to phage therapy currently relies on heterogeneous regulatory mechanisms, including compassionate use programmes, magistral preparations, named-patient pathways, and other national frameworks. Overall, phage therapy represents a promising strategy for selected infections, but its broader clinical adoption will depend on harmonized regulatory approaches, robust quality standards, and the generation of stronger clinical evidence to support safe and scalable use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.