ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Limitations and Blind Spots of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Evaluation of Acute Brain Ischemia: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Added Value of Thin-Section Coronal DWI for Lesion Visualization in Acute Brainstem Infarction: A Retrospective Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Disruption of amino acid metabolism in acute cerebrovascular diseases: diagnostic and pathobiochemical perspectives.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been increasingly utilized in the emergent evaluation of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. DWI enhances sensitivity and specificity and enables the use of delayed reperfusion treatments in selected cases. However, DWI is not devoid of limitations. DWI-negative AIS is not uncommon in clinical practice and is reported in up to 1 of 4 AIS patients. We reviewed the relevant literature and searched the PubMed and Google Scholar databases for studies reporting on DWI-negative AIS prevalence during the 2021-2025 time period. Additionally, we included cases from our practice to highlight key points. DWI-negative AIS prevalence was 16% in one meta-analysis and ranged from 6.9% to 23.2% in identified studies that met our inclusion criteria. The biological, pathophysiological, technical, epidemiological and clinical factors that contribute to DWI-negative stroke are presented in detail. Overall, the application of diffusion imaging modalities for stroke is not bereft of blind spots despite enhanced sensitivity. Over-reliance on advanced neuroimaging and unfamiliarity with its limitations predispose DWI to errors in AIS assessment. Awareness of the predisposing factors, treatment effect, and prognosis guides appropriate decision-making, promoting good outcomes. Prospective appropriately designed trials should address the lingering questions identified, such as the association between time of imaging and DWI negativity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.