Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41598756›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026

Advent of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Research: An Updated Perspective.

Apratim Maity, Ethan D L Brown, Ryan A McCann, Aryaa Karkare, Emily A Orsino, Shaila D Ghanekar, Barnabas Obeng-Gyasi, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, Daniel M Sciubba, Aladine A Elsamadicy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Apratim MaityDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker Hofstra School of Medicine at Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-0299-0905
Ethan D L BrownDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker Hofstra School of Medicine at Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-6933-0745
Ryan A McCannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker Hofstra School of Medicine at Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8445-8988
Aryaa KarkareDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker Hofstra School of Medicine at Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2365-9985
Emily A OrsinoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker Hofstra School of Medicine at Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.
Shaila D GhanekarYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Barnabas Obeng-GyasiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3346-1631
Sheng-Fu Larry LoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker Hofstra School of Medicine at Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7262-2544
Daniel M SciubbaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker Hofstra School of Medicine at Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7604-434X
Aladine A ElsamadicyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker Hofstra School of Medicine at Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly evolved from an experimental tool in spine research to a multi-domain framework that has significantly influenced imaging analysis, surgical decision-making, and individualized outcome prediction. Recent advances have expanded beyond isolated applications, enabling automated image interpretation, patient-specific risk stratification, discovery of qualitative phenotypes, and integration of heterogeneous clinical and biomechanical data. These developments signal a shift toward more comprehensive, context-aware analytic systems capable of supporting complex clinical workflows in spine care. Despite these gains, widespread clinical adoption remains limited. High internal performance metrics do not consistently translate into reliable generalizability, interpretability, or real-world clinical readiness. Persistent challenges, which include dataset heterogeneity, transportability across institutions, alignment with clinical decision-making processes, and appropriate validation strategies, continue to constrain widespread implementation. In this perspective, we synthesize post-2019 advances in spine AI across key application domains: imaging analysis, predictive modeling and decision support, qualitative phenotyping, and emerging hybrid and language-based frameworks through a unified clinical-readiness lens. By examining how methodological progress aligns with clinical context, validation rigor, and interpretability, we highlight both the transformative potential of AI in spine research and the critical steps required for responsible, effective integration into routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical decision supportclusteringdeep learninggeneralizabilityhybrid modelingimaging analysislarge language modelsmachine learningnatural language processingphenotype discoverypredictive modelingspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID41598756
PMCPMC12841851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.