ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Current Knowledge of Respiratory Function in Early Onset Scoliosis and the Effect of Its Contemporary Surgical Treatment.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS), defined as presenting before 10 years of age, often has a significant adverse impact on pulmonary function, due to a complex interrelationship between the spine, chest, pulmonary structures and their development. Left untreated, EOS leads to premature death, with early fusion surgery to arrest curve progression making little impact on this. To date, the natural history has not been clearly established as compounded by the heterogeneity of pathologies, causing EOS and challenges in objective measurements of pulmonary function in this young age group. A desire to address this poor natural history has motivated interest in pursuing 'growth friendly' surgical strategies. The implants used have evolved with time, often to address compromises and poor results, with multiple options now available based on treatment principles (distraction, compression, or guided growth systems). The aims of such strategies are to control the structural spinal deformity, whilst allowing spinal and thoracic growth, with the seemingly reasonable expectation that this will result in improved pulmonary function and avoidance of premature death. Most studies have focused on radiological outcome measures such as Cobb angle and thoracic height to gauge the success of surgery, with these measures acting as surrogate markers of improved pulmonary outcome. This assumption, however, is not supported by more recent clinical data which has attempted to assess directly the pulmonary outcomes associated with growth-friendly surgical strategies. This literature review therefore sets out to characterise the effect of EOS on pulmonary function and to critically analyse the impact surgical treatment options will have while addressing this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.