ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: From Basic Knowledge to Recent Guidelines.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence in pancreatic cyst characterization: future or fiction?Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Pediatric Pancreatic Pseudocyst Presenting as a Solid Perigastric Mass: An Uncommon Diagnostic Pitfall.Case reports in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly detected due to widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. They encompass a heterogeneous group of lesions, ranging from benign pseudocysts and serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) to premalignant mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), as well as rare malignant entities such as solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (SPENs) and cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (cystic PanNETs). Management of PCLs depends on their malignant potential; therefore, an accurate classification is essential for optimizing treatment. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge on the epidemiology, imaging characteristics, diagnosis, and management of PCLs, highlighting the role of CT, MRI, MRCP, and endoscopic ultrasound. Recent advances in radiomics for lesion characterization and risk stratification, particularly in IPMNs, are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.