Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41598427›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Recognizing Coagulation Disorders in Sepsis in the Emergency Room: A Narrative Review.

Toshiaki Iba, Tomoki Tanigawa, Hideo Wada, Kenta Kondo, Ricard Ferrer, Jerrold H Levy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Toshiaki IbaFaculty of Medical Science, Juntendo University, Urayasu 279-0023, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0255-4088
Tomoki TanigawaDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-4633-0041
Hideo WadaDepartment of General Medicine, Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Yokkaichi 510-8561, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9021-8633
Kenta KondoDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Ricard FerrerIntensive Care Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 119-129 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4859-4747
Jerrold H LevyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3766-4962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis remains a leading cause of global mortality, and early management in the emergency department (ED) is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. Among the earliest physiological derangements in sepsis are abnormalities in coagulation, which represent not merely laboratory disturbances but fundamental reflections of dysregulated host response, endothelial injury, and evolving microvascular thrombosis. Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) form a dynamic continuum that frequently begins before shock is clinically apparent. Despite their prognostic value and pathophysiologic significance, these abnormalities are often underrecognized in the ED, where coagulation tests are still commonly interpreted through the narrow lens of bleeding risk rather than as markers of systemic thromboinflammation. This narrative review synthesizes current understanding of the mechanisms linking sepsis, endothelial dysfunction, and coagulation abnormalities; outlines the distinction between SIC and overt DIC; and highlights why early identification of coagulopathy in the ED is essential. We discuss practical bedside approaches, including recommended laboratory testing, pattern recognition, and application of validated scores such as the SIC and ISTH DIC criteria. System-level strategies, such as embedding coagulation testing into sepsis bundles, automating score calculation, and enhancing communication between the ED and ICU teams, are explored as avenues to improve early detection. Evidence suggests that ED recognition of SIC/DIC may refine risk stratification, guide triage decisions, and identify patients who may benefit from targeted anticoagulant strategies once stabilized. Ultimately, recognizing coagulation disorders in the ED reframes sepsis not solely as a hemodynamic crisis but as a complex, thromboinflammatory syndrome in which early intervention may alter trajectory and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

anticoagulantscoagulopathydisseminated intravascular coagulationintensive care unitorgan dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41598427
PMCPMC12842504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.