ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair at a Crossroads: Prognosis-Shaping Intervention or High-Tech Palliation?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has historically been undertreated despite its strong association with morbidity and mortality. Surgical correction of isolated TR is not routinely performed and has shown limited survival benefit, leaving a substantial unmet need for minimally invasive therapies. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic severe or greater (≥severe) TR who are unsuitable for surgery. Recent randomized trials, including the TRILUMINATE Pivotal and the Tri-FR study, and real-world registries consistently demonstrate significant improvements in TR severity, functional status, and quality of life following T-TEER. Although benefits in hard clinical endpoints such as mortality or heart failure hospitalizations remain less conclusive, growing evidence suggests potential prognostic advantage in selected patients, particularly those with preserved or mid-range right ventricular function. Anatomical suitability, RV performance, and optimized patient selection are crucial determinants of success. As ongoing large-scale trials continue to evaluate long-term outcomes, T-TEER currently occupies a therapeutic space between palliative intervention and disease-modifying therapy, providing substantial symptom relief with the potential for broader clinical benefit. This review summarizes current evidence, patient selection strategies, and perspectives on the evolving role of T-TEER in the management of severe TR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.