Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41598323›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Selection for Molecularly Complementary Modules (MCMs) Drives the Origins and Evolution of Pleiofunctional, Epistatic Interactomes (PEIs).

Robert Root-Bernstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert Root-BernsteinDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3298-9306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The huge number of possible permutations of genes, proteins and small molecules make the random emergence of cellular networks problematic. How, therefore, do interactomes come into existence? What selects for their stability and functionality? I hypothesize that interactomes originate from molecularly complementary modules (MCMs) that are selected for stability and retain their interactivity when mixed and matched with other such modules to create novel molecules and complexes displaying emergent properties not present in the individual components of the network. Because evolution can only proceed by working upon existing variants, and these variants emerge from selection of MCMs, the resulting systems must exhibit the characteristics of pleiofunctional, epistatic interactomes (PEIs). The resulting systems should display "molecular paleontology", providing clues as to the historical process by which these MCMs were incorporated into the system. The MCM mechanism of PEI evolution is illustrated here by two case studies. The first concerns the prebiotic emergence of the glutathione-ascorbate anti-oxidant system and its later incorporation into regulation of glucose transport and catecholamine receptor activity. The second concerns the MCM evolution of the ribosome as, perhaps, the first PEI, and its role as a module for the later construction of the first cellular genomes.

Indexed as

epistaticinteractomemolecular complementarityoriginspleiofunctional

Identifiers

PMID41598323
PMCPMC12843354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.