Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41598281›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Electrical Muscle Stimulation with Russian Current in Chronic Cerebral Ischaemia.

Nelly M A Artamonova, Alina A Saveko, Tatiana A Shigueva, Vladimir V Kitov, Maria A Avdeeva, Valentina N Tsyganova, Tatyana Yu Orestova, Alla B Guekht, Elena S Tomilovskaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nelly M A ArtamonovaRussian Federation State Research Center, Institute of Biomedical Problems RAS (IBMP), 123007 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-2704
Alina A SavekoRussian Federation State Research Center, Institute of Biomedical Problems RAS (IBMP), 123007 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9056-3701
Tatiana A ShiguevaRussian Federation State Research Center, Institute of Biomedical Problems RAS (IBMP), 123007 Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir V KitovRussian Federation State Research Center, Institute of Biomedical Problems RAS (IBMP), 123007 Moscow, Russia.
Maria A AvdeevaResearch and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Moscow Healthcare Department, 127006 Moscow, Russia.
Valentina N TsyganovaResearch and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Moscow Healthcare Department, 127006 Moscow, Russia.
Tatyana Yu OrestovaResearch and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Moscow Healthcare Department, 127006 Moscow, Russia.
Alla B GuekhtResearch and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Moscow Healthcare Department, 127006 Moscow, Russia.
Elena S TomilovskayaRussian Federation State Research Center, Institute of Biomedical Problems RAS (IBMP), 123007 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9030-6876

Funding

The Program of applied research of IBMP RAS FMFR-2025-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test whether inpatient electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) using Russian current (5 kHz carrier, 50 Hz modulation; 4 s ON/6 s OFF) improves mobility and balance in elderly people with chronic cerebral ischaemia.

designProspective single-centre controlled observational pilot, embedded in routine inpatient rehabilitation; no concealed randomisation (EMS + standard care; sham EMS + standard care; standard care only (control)).

methodsA single-centre controlled observational study with three groups was conducted (EMS n = 27, control n = 10, sham n = 7) with 3-9 sessions over 2 weeks (20 min; quadriceps and calves). Pre/Post Outcomes: Tinetti (balance/gait), Rivermead Mobility Index, Timed Up and Go (TUG), ankle extensor maximal voluntary force (MVF), stabilography (statokinesiogram path length (L), mean velocity of COP (V), sway area (S), and myotonometry; ANOVA, α = 0.05). Ethics approval and informed consent were obtained. Between-group differences in change scores were evaluated descriptively, and no formal hypothesis-testing was planned.

resultsEMS showed significant gains versus control/sham-higher Tinetti total and Rivermead scores, faster TUG, higher MVF, and improved stabilography in the eyes-closed condition (reduced L, V, and S), with good tolerability and no serious adverse events (SAEs).

conclusionsShort-course Russian-current EMS is feasible and associated with clinically meaningful improvements in balance, gait, and strength in elderly patients with chronic cerebral ischaemia; however, larger randomised trials are warranted.

Indexed as

balancechronic cerebral ischaemiaelectrical muscle stimulationgaitrehabilitationRussian currentstabilographytimed up and go testTinetti test

Identifiers

PMID41598281
PMCPMC12843009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.