ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Safety Profile of a Portfolio of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Soft Tissue Fillers Manufactured Using MACRO Technology: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers are widely used in aesthetic dermatology for their biocompatibility, reversibility, and safety; however, adverse events (AEs) may occur. This review evaluated the safety profile, focusing on short- and long-term AEs, of HA fillers manufactured with MACRO (MAtrix CROsslinking) Core Technology, encompassing both current saypha and former Princess products. A systematic PubMed search identified prospective clinical trials assessing safety outcomes following facial aesthetic use of these fillers. Eleven studies including 947 patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common short-term AEs were transient swelling, injection site pain, and bruising, which were predominantly mild to moderate and resolved within two weeks. Severe or serious treatment-related events were rare, with only one reported across all studies. Long-term AEs, such as delayed-onset nodules or inflammatory reactions, were infrequent and mild, with no granulomas, hypersensitivity responses, or vascular complications observed. Safety outcomes were consistent across formulations and between the legacy Princess and current saypha products. Overall, the saypha HA filler portfolio demonstrates a predictable and strong safety profile within the expected range reported in the broader literature, noting the limitations of cross-study comparisons. Most AEs were related to injection trauma rather than the filler itself, supporting its continued use in clinical aesthetic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.