ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Review on Mining Robust Lactic Acid Bacteria for Next-Generation Silage Inoculants via Multi-Omics.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative multi-omics analysis of microbial succession, metabolite profiles, and antioxidant properties in fermented black and yellow highland barley.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Exploring lactic acid bacteria from fresh fruits, vegetables, and edible flowers: from biodiversity valorisation to food applications.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB), as the core microorganisms in silage fermentation, play a crucial role in improving silage quality and ensuring feed safety, making the screening, identification, and functional characterization of LAB strains a significant research focus. Researchers initially isolate and purify LAB from various samples, followed by identification through a combination of morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular biological methods. Systematic screening has been conducted to identify LAB strains tolerant to extreme environments (e.g., low temperature, high temperature, high salinity) and those possessing functional traits such as antimicrobial activity, antioxidant capacity, production of feruloyl esterase and bacteriocins, as well as cellulose degradation, yielding a series of notable findings. Furthermore, modern technologies, including microbiomics, metabolomics, metagenomics, and transcriptomics, have been employed to analyze the structure and functional potential of microbial communities, as well as metabolic dynamics during the ensiling process. The addition of superior LAB inoculants not only facilitates rapid acidification to reduce nutrient loss, inhibit harmful microorganisms, and improve fermentation quality and palatability but also demonstrates potential functions such as degrading mycotoxins, adsorbing heavy metals, and reducing methane emissions. However, its application efficacy is directly constrained by factors such as strain-crop specific interactions, high dependence on raw material conditions, limited functionality of bacterial strains, and relatively high application costs. In summary, the integration of multi-omics technologies with traditional methods, along with in-depth exploration of novel resources like phyllosphere endophytic LAB, will provide new directions for developing efficient and targeted LAB inoculants for silage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.