Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41598135›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Advanced Numerical Modeling of Powder Bed Fusion: From Physics-Based Simulations to AI-Augmented Digital Twins.

Łukasz Łach, Dmytro Svyetlichnyy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Łukasz ŁachAGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9604-8874
Dmytro SvyetlichnyyAGH University of Krakow, Faculty of Metals Engineering and Industrial Computer Science, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-2444

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland 16.16.110.663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Powder bed fusion (PBF) is a widely adopted additive manufacturing (AM) process category that enables high-resolution fabrication across metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites. However, its inherent process complexity demands robust modeling to ensure quality, reliability, and scalability. This review provides a critical synthesis of advances in physics-based simulations, machine learning, and digital twin frameworks for PBF. We analyze progress across scales-from micro-scale melt pool dynamics and mesoscale track stability to part-scale residual stress predictions-while highlighting the growing role of hybrid physics-data-driven approaches in capturing process-structure-property (PSP) relationships. Special emphasis is given to the integration of real-time sensing, multi-scale modeling, and AI-enhanced optimization, which together form the foundation of emerging PBF digital twins. Key challenges-including computational cost, data scarcity, and model interoperability-are critically examined, alongside opportunities for scalable, interpretable, and industry-ready digital twin platforms. By outlining both the current state-of-the-art and future research priorities, this review positions digital twins as a transformative paradigm for advancing PBF toward reliable, high-quality, and industrially scalable manufacturing.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingdefect predictiondigital twinsindustrial applicationsmachine learningmultiphysics simulationmultiscale modelingPowder Bed Fusion (PBF)process monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41598135
PMCPMC12843373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.