ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effect of Post-Printing Methods on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy Samples Fabricated Using Laser Powder Bed Fusion.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser powder bead fusion (LPBF) allows for the fabrication of highly accurate components from metal powders, which is difficult to achieve using traditional methods. LPBF-produced components can be characterized by their porosity and unfavorable microstructure, making further processing difficult. Therefore, appropriate post-printing methods are crucial, as they reduce porosity, reduce residual stresses, and stabilize the microstructure. The aim of this paper was to determine the effect of post-printing methods on the microhardness and microstructure of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy samples fabricated using the LPBF process in different orientations. Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) at various temperatures (910 °C, 1150 °C, 1250 °C), annealing at 1020 °C, and twist channel angular pressing using a 90° channel ending with a helical exit were considered postprocessing methods for LPBF-produced samples. Printing orientation significantly determined the effectiveness of HIP and the heat treatment processes. Higher microhardness was observed on the cross-section oriented perpendicular to the 3D printing direction. Annealing under appropriately selected conditions favors the precipitation of fine particles of the α phase in the β phase, leading to a strengthening effect by precipitation. Based on the microhardness measurements, clear differences were observed in the mean values, statistical ranges, and result distributions depending on the printing plane, HIP process parameters, and the use of an additional heat treatment. The HIP process leads to a more pronounced homogenization of microstructure and defect reduction, with the morphology of the microstructure and microhardness distribution dependent on the HIP process temperature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.