ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Investigation into the Adhesion Performance of the Recycled Asphalt Mastic-Limestone Filler Interface Using the Pull-Off Test and Surface Free Energy Theory.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the adhesion performance of the recycled asphalt mastic (RAM)-limestone filler interface and the contribution ratio (CR) of mineral filler to the adhesion performance of the RAM-limestone filler interface. Using the pull-off test and surface free energy theory, the impacts of aged asphalt binder dosage, resurfacing dosage, and filler-asphalt binder ratio (F/A) on the grip capacity of the RAM-limestone filler contact were examined. The CR of mineral filler to the adhesion performance of the RAM-limestone filler interface under different influencing factors was calculated. Results show that the bonding strength and adhesion work of the RAM-limestone filler interface reach their best when the aged asphalt binder dosage is 20%. As the rejuvenator dosage increases, the RAM-limestone filler interface's adhesion performance declines. As the amount of mineral filler increases, the bonding strength of the RAM-limestone filler interface first rises and subsequently falls. When the dosage of aged asphalt binder is 20%, the mineral filler's CR to the RAM-limestone filler interface's adhesion performance is at its highest. The impact of mineral filler on the RAM-limestone filler interface's adhesion performance can be lessened by increasing the amount of rejuvenator. The greatest CR of mineral filler to the adhesion performance of the RAM-limestone filler interface occurs when the F/A is 1.4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.