In one paragraphArticle in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
9 authors.
Arkadiusz GendekDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 164, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3370-6590 Monika AniszewskaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 164, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3685-4919 Paweł TylekDepartment of Forest Utilization and Forestry Technology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4384-6095 Grzegorz SzewczykDepartment of Forest Utilization and Forestry Technology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9747-4824 Jozef KrilekDepartment of Environmental and Forestry Machinery, Faculty of Technology, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-8349-5269 Iveta ČabalováDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Technologies, Faculty of Wood Sciences and Technology, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 960 01 Zvolen, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-2775-047X Jan MalaťákDepartment of Technological Equipment of Buildings, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcka 129, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4822-3997 Jiří BradnaDepartment of Technological Equipment of Buildings, Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcka 129, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3439-7395 Katalin Szakálos-MátyásInstitute of Forest and Natural Resource Management, University of Sopron, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky u. 4, 9400 Sopron, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9914-9056 Funding
Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Engineering (IGA TF) at the Czech University of Life Sciences Grant No. 2024: 31170/1312/3105International Visegrad Fund Visegrad Grant No. 22420094Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-21-0180
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Pellets produced from raw or torrefied shredded logging residues have been investigated in the study. The research material came from pine and spruce stands in Poland, Slovakia, Czechia and Hungary. Torrefaction temperatures (
Indexed as
biomasscalorific valuecompressive strengthelemental compositionpelletstorrefaction
Identifiers
PMID41598028
PMCPMC12842769
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390